Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014827›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Bearing fault diagnosis based on multi-branch enhanced GhostNet with adaptive focal loss.

Li Zhang, Tingting Jiang, Tingting Liu, Jiaxuan Chen, Yuting Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Li ZhangFaculty of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China.
Tingting JiangFaculty of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China.
Tingting LiuFaculty of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China. liutingting@lnu.edu.cn.
Jiaxuan ChenFaculty of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China.
Yuting GuoFaculty of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China.

Funding

Joint Project of Liaoning Provincial Science and Technology Program 2025-MSLH-313National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFC3013901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insufficient fault samples and severe class imbalance present significant challenges for intelligent bearing fault diagnosis. To overcome these issues, this paper proposes a lightweight diagnostic approach that combines an adaptive focal loss function with a multi-branch enhanced ghost network, aiming to improve both accuracy and efficiency under limited and imbalanced data conditions. Specifically, for the small-sample problem, a Lightweight Multi-Branch Enhanced Network (LMBE) is constructed, centered on a novel Multi-Branch Enhanced Ghost Bottleneck (MBEG-bneck) designed to capture high-frequency features and enhance fault pattern recognition. For the class-imbalance problem, a Variable Focusing Class-Balanced Focal Loss (VF-CBFL) is established, which uses a tangent-based dynamic focusing mechanism to adaptively adjust the model's emphasis on hard and easy samples during training, while incorporating a class-balance factor to handle differences in sample numbers across classes. By jointly enhancing feature extraction and loss optimization, the proposed method effectively alleviates the limitations caused by small samples and data imbalance. Experiments conducted on two bearing datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves high diagnostic accuracy and strong generalization capability, attaining an accuracy of 98.96% under the extreme imbalance scenario of 10:1 with limited samples.

Indexed as

Data imbalanceFault diagnosisGhostNetSmall sampleVariable focal loss

Identifiers

PMID42014827
PMCPMC13265811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.