ArticleScientific reports2026
Multimodal preclinical study of long-term effects of prenatal ultrasound on the mouse central nervous system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of repetitive scanning ultrasound on the intraneuronal dendritic signalling of CA1 pyramidal neurons.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of the central nervous system is regulated by multiple spatio-temporally varying factors that are essential for neurons to form functional networks. Prenatal ultrasound (US) exposure may affect the dendritic arborization and spine density of CA1 neurons in the hippocampus—a key region for memory processing—but the mid- and long-term effects of this exposure are still not well understood. In this study, we used an animal model to examine how repeated prenatal US exposure impacts memory function. After treatments, we assessed the memory performance of both treated and control animals and analysed the CNS for microstructural changes in the brain tissue. We also explored potential changes in glucose metabolism and hippocampal transcriptomic profiles, focusing on calcium signaling. Our results did not reveal any changes in memory performance in US-exposed animals, despite notable microstructural impairments detected in several white matter tracts. RNA sequencing analysis revealed that US exposure causes lasting changes in calcium signaling pathways, which are known to be crucial for memory formation. Overall, our findings demonstrate that prenatal US screening in an animal model can produce enduring molecular, structural effects, underscoring the importance of further research into the safety and long-term implications of prenatal US screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.