ArticleScientific reports2026
Cannabis flower crude extracts as belowground infochemicals shaping the chemotactic responses of parasitic nematodes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread use of synthetic pesticides has raised concerns about their impacts on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, increasing interest in plant-derived compounds as environmentally compatible alternatives. Cannabis sativa L. produces a diverse array of secondary metabolites, including cannabinoids and terpenes, which may act as chemical cues in belowground ecological interactions. This study examined the chemotactic responses of five nematode species - Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Poinar), Steinernema carpocapsae (Weiser), Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev), Oscheius myriophilus (Poinar), and Phasmarhabditis papillosa (Schneider)- to various concentrations of crude flower extracts of C. sativa. Chemotaxis assays were conducted using an agar-based system, and nematode responses were quantified as overall motility and Chemotaxis Index (CI). Cannabinoid and terpene profiles were determined by HPLC-UV/DAD and GC-MS. Nematode species identity and extract concentration were the primary factors influencing motility and chemotactic behaviour, whereas chemotype extract identity had a minor effect. H. bacteriophora, S. feltiae, and P. papillosa showed positive chemotactic responses (higher CI values) in a species- and concentration-dependent manner, whereas S. carpocapsae and O. myriophilus exhibited mostly neutral responses. Chemotactic behaviour was strongly species-specific and concentration-dependent, with extract identity playing a minor role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.