ArticleScientific reports2026
Biochar-mediated enhancement of soil quality and nutrient availability to spinach under water-limited conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biochar as a soil amendment can mitigate plant water stress. But its effects on soil quality in calcareous soils, particularly under varying moisture conditions, have not been studied. Therefore, this three replicated factorial greenhouse study evaluated the effects of cattle manure-derived biochar (0 (B0), 25 (B25), 50 (B50), and 100 (B100) t ha− 1 which are equivalent to 0, 1.25, 2.5, and 5%wt, respectively) on spinach yield and the soil quality indices (SQI) of the postharvest soils under three soil moisture levels (100% (W100), 70% (W70), and 55% (W55) of field capacity, FC). Soil quality indices and their grades were assessed using a total of 27 soil indicators (TDS) and minimum (MDS) data sets derived from principal component analysis (PCA), with the Nemoro (NQI) and integrated (IQI) soil quality indices. PCA identified six principal components (PCs) with eigenvalues > 1, accounting for 94.77% of cumulative variance. The most influential indicators (MDS) comprised soil iron, copper, and nitrogen concentrations, mean weight diameter (MWDd), and geometric mean diameter (GMDd) from dry sieving, and ∆GMD (with eigenvectors of 0.745, 0.565, 0.958, 0.801, 0.863, and 0.743, respectively). Correlations between IQI-TDS, IQI-MDS, NQI-MDS, and most plant and soil properties were positive, except for electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, and soil sodium concentration. PCA revealed that B50W55 and B100W55 were the most effective treatments, showing higher PC1 and lower PC2 scores, and were associated with improved greenness index, water repellency, penetration resistance, plant nitrogen, phosphorus, and sodium, as well as soil potassium, magnesium, and iron. Quality grades of the biochar-treated soil varied from III to IV under drought conditions. The highest soil property scores were achieved with 100 t ha⁻¹ biochar, whereas the best plant property scores occurred with 50 t ha⁻¹ biochar at 55% FC. The lowest scores across all properties were observed in the control (no biochar). Based on the sensitivity index and efficiency ratio, IQI-MDS was identified as the optimal model for representing soil quality in relation to crop yield. Overall, biochar application enhanced soil quality indices and crop yield by supplying nutrients and improving soil attributes. These findings highlight biochar’s potential to sustain soil health and productivity under drought conditions, which are increasingly common in arid and semi-arid regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.