Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014770›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

PeFoMed: Parameter efficient fine-tuning of multimodal large language models for medical CXR.

Gang Liu, Xiaotian Tang, Jinlong He, Pengfei Li, Zhaolin Chen, Shenjun Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gang LiuCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China.
Xiaotian TangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China. tangxiaotian@hrbeu.edu.cn.
Jinlong HeCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China.
Pengfei LiCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China.
Zhaolin ChenMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, 3800, Australia.
Shenjun ZhongMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, 3800, Australia.

Funding

Harbin Engineering University Special Discipline Basic Research Stable Support Project KYWZ120240601Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Science Research Planning Fund Projec 23YJAZ-H079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) represent an evolutionary expansion in the capabilities of traditional large language models, enabling them to tackle challenges that surpass the scope of purely text-based applications. Recent works investigate the adaptation of MLLMs as a universal solution to address medical multi-modal problems as a generative task. In this paper, we propose a parameter efficient framework for fine-tuning MLLMs, specifically validated on medical visual question answering (Med-VQA) and medical report generation (MRG) tasks, using public benchmark datasets. We also introduce an evaluation metric using the 5-point Likert scale and its weighted average value to measure the quality of the generated reports for MRG tasks, where the scale ratings are labelled by both humans manually and the GPT-4 model. We further assess the consistency of performance metrics across traditional measures, GPT-4, and human ratings for both VQA and MRG tasks. The results indicate that GPT-4-based semantic evaluation can provide a scalable supplementary signal for assessing generated outputs, yet they reveal a discrepancy when compared to conventional lexical similarity measurements. This questions the reliability of lexical similarity metrics for evaluating the performance of generative models in Med-VQA and report generation tasks.

Indexed as

Large Language ModelsAlgorithmsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansSemanticsGenerative modelMedical report generationMedical visual question answeringMultimodal large language modelParameter efficient fine-tuning

Identifiers

PMID42014770
PMCPMC13273104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.