ArticleScientific reports2026
PeFoMed: Parameter efficient fine-tuning of multimodal large language models for medical CXR.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fine-tuned multimodal GPT-4o for generating diagnostic impressions in breast magnetic resonance imaging: insights into non-mass enhancement lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Federated CT foundation models for multi-center detection of lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A comparison of GPT-4V's capability in optical coherence tomography images of age-related macular degeneration with expert assessments.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- MiniGPT-Pancreas: Multimodal Large Language Model for Pancreas Cancer Observation and Localization in CT Images.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2026Article
- ECSA: Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting and Few-Shot Generalization in Medical Visual Question Answering.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Large Language Models in Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Survey and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Glaucoma Detection and Feature Identification via GPT-4V Fundus Image Analysis.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) represent an evolutionary expansion in the capabilities of traditional large language models, enabling them to tackle challenges that surpass the scope of purely text-based applications. Recent works investigate the adaptation of MLLMs as a universal solution to address medical multi-modal problems as a generative task. In this paper, we propose a parameter efficient framework for fine-tuning MLLMs, specifically validated on medical visual question answering (Med-VQA) and medical report generation (MRG) tasks, using public benchmark datasets. We also introduce an evaluation metric using the 5-point Likert scale and its weighted average value to measure the quality of the generated reports for MRG tasks, where the scale ratings are labelled by both humans manually and the GPT-4 model. We further assess the consistency of performance metrics across traditional measures, GPT-4, and human ratings for both VQA and MRG tasks. The results indicate that GPT-4-based semantic evaluation can provide a scalable supplementary signal for assessing generated outputs, yet they reveal a discrepancy when compared to conventional lexical similarity measurements. This questions the reliability of lexical similarity metrics for evaluating the performance of generative models in Med-VQA and report generation tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.