Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014768›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Adaptive multi-sensor point cloud fusion for geometric reconstruction toward digital twin construction based on quality-driven weight optimization.

Liyuan Meng, Yikang Liu, Jie Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liyuan MengSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Suqian University, Suqian, 223800, Jiangsu, China. lymeng_sci@163.com.
Yikang LiuSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Suqian University, Suqian, 223800, Jiangsu, China.
Jie ZhuInformation Technology Institute, Jiangsu Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, 210017, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital twin technology demands high-fidelity three-dimensional geometric representations, yet single-sensor acquisition systems suffer from limited coverage, uneven sampling density, and environmental susceptibility. This paper presents an adaptive weight allocation framework for multi-sensor point cloud fusion that dynamically evaluates sensor reliability based on local geometric features and statistical consistency measures. Unlike conventional fixed-weight or rule-based approaches, the proposed methodology computes spatially-varying fusion weights through multi-dimensional quality assessment encompassing geometric consistency, point density, outlier characteristics, and surface normal coherence. An octree-based spatial partitioning strategy enables efficient processing while maintaining sufficient local samples for statistically meaningful quality estimation. Experimental validation across manufacturing, architectural heritage, and infrastructure scenarios demonstrates 15–46% improvement over baseline methods—28–42% in absolute positional accuracy measured against laser tracker references in the manufacturing scenario, and 15–46% in cross-validated internal consistency across all three scenarios—achieving mean positional errors below 2 mm and 96.7% coverage of sensor-accessible surfaces. Real-world deployment in manufacturing equipment monitoring and construction progress tracking detected dimensional deviations—specifically a 0.8 mm spindle drift and 12–27 mm pipeline installation offsets—that periodic manual caliper measurements and visual inspections had not flagged, validating practical utility for industrial 3D modeling applications. The framework’s sensor-agnostic design and computational efficiency make it suitable for near-real-time geometric model synchronization within digital twin pipelines across diverse operational environments. We note that the current weighting coefficients are empirically tuned rather than dynamically learned; nevertheless, sensitivity analysis confirms robustness to coefficient perturbation across the tested scenarios.

Indexed as

3D reconstructionAdaptive weightingDigital twinMulti-sensor collaborationPoint cloud fusionQuality assessment

Identifiers

PMID42014768
PMCPMC13269709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.