Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014759›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

MEAST: a novel framework for analyzing gene set stability in single cell transcriptomics.

Fadi Abou Choucha, Claude Pasquier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fadi Abou ChouchaUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, I3S, Sophia-Antipolis, France. fchoucha@hotmail.com.
Claude PasquierUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, I3S, Sophia-Antipolis, France.

Funding

National Research Agency ANR-15-IDEX-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological processes rely on the coordinated activity of multiple genes, forming biological pathways that regulate specific cellular functions. Gene set activity analysis tools are essential for understanding how groups of genes regulate these processes. However, accurately scoring the activity of the most effective genes within a gene set remains challenging. Here, we introduce MEAST (Modular Expression Analysis and Scoring Toolkit), a robust computational framework that combines truncated singular value decomposition for gene set scoring with a genetic algorithm to identify stable, high-contributing subsets of genes. We validated our approach using both simulated and real single-cell RNA-seq datasets. In real single-cell blood RNA-seq datasets, the activity scoring function accurately distinguished between cell subtypes. Moreover, when tested on bulk RNA data, MEAST successfully distinguished between lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma by accurately scoring marker gene activities. The main feature of MEAST is the stability assessment, which based on activity scoring and uses a genetic algorithm to identify the core active genes within a gene set. Our results showed that MEAST effectively eliminates all low-activity genes in single-cell RNA-seq data. This study presents an advanced framework to analyze scRNA-seq data in wide system biology applications including biomarker identification, disease subtype classification, drug response prediction, and pathway analysis.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAdenocarcinoma of LungAlgorithmsGenetic AlgorithmsHumansLung NeoplasmsSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisBiomarker identificationGene set analysisGenetic algorithmPathway activitySingular value decompositionTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID42014759
PMCPMC13269925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.