Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014722›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Seven complete comparative maps of allosteric mutations in a protein family.

Aina Martí-Aranda, Ben Lehner

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aina Martí-ArandaWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6144-1243
Ben LehnerWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK. bl11@sanger.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8817-1124

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 883742"la Caixa" Foundation (Caixa Foundation) B006052Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 220540/Z/20/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-range communication in proteins is key to biological regulation and the efficacy of many drugs. However, the extent to which indirect energetic couplings between distant sites are conserved in homologous proteins during evolution is largely unknown. Here we directly address this question by constructing seven comprehensive maps of how mutations throughout five homologous human PDZ domains directly and indirectly alter the energy of binding to peptide ligands. The combined dataset quantifies 21,802 free energy changes - 9064 changes in fold stability (∆∆Gf) for five PDZ domains and 12,738 changes in binding energy (∆∆Gb) across seven interactions. The maps allow a comparison of the energetic landscapes of binding interfaces and the conservation of hotspot residues. They also allow comprehensive identification and comparison of allosteric mutations, those outside of the binding interface that alter the binding energy. The proteins have a conserved distant-dependent decay in the energetic effects of mutations away from the binding interfaces. However each protein also has protein-specific allosteric mutations, including in both structurally-aligned sites and protein-specific domain extensions. The divergence in the location of allosteric mutations in each protein suggests that each protein in a family might have distinct sites to target with allosteric drugs.

Indexed as

MutationProteinsAllosteric RegulationBinding SitesHumansLigandsModels, MolecularPDZ DomainsProtein BindingThermodynamicsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID42014722
PMCPMC13284222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.