Articlenpj aging2026
Mild cognitive impairment cases affect the predictive power of Alzheimer's disease diagnostic models using routine clinical variables.
Article in npj aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning for Alzheimer's disease progression under extreme class imbalance.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnostic models using primary care routine clinical variables have been limited in their ability to identify Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. In this study, we sought to better understand the effect of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) on the predictive performance of AD diagnostic models. We sourced data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. CatBoost was used to assess the utility of routine clinical variables that are accessible to primary care physicians, such as hematological and blood tests and medical history, in multiclass classification between healthy controls, MCI, and AD. Our results indicated that MCI indeed affected the predictive performance of AD diagnostic models. Of the three subgroups of MCI that we found, this finding was driven by a subgroup of MCI patients who likely have prodromal AD. This work highlights the importance of continuing to focus on better classification of the different types of MCI to improve diagnostic models of AD, rather than focusing on binary classifications between AD and control cases. Future research should focus on distinguishing MCI from prodromal AD as the utmost priority for improving translational AD diagnostic models for primary care physicians.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.