Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014714›Full record

Articlenpj aging2026

Mild cognitive impairment cases affect the predictive power of Alzheimer's disease diagnostic models using routine clinical variables.

Caitlin A Finney, Artur Shvetcov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caitlin A FinneyNeurodegeneration and Disease Modelling Lab, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia. caitlin.finney@wimr.org.au.
Artur ShvetcovNeurodegeneration and Disease Modelling Lab, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic models using primary care routine clinical variables have been limited in their ability to identify Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. In this study, we sought to better understand the effect of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) on the predictive performance of AD diagnostic models. We sourced data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. CatBoost was used to assess the utility of routine clinical variables that are accessible to primary care physicians, such as hematological and blood tests and medical history, in multiclass classification between healthy controls, MCI, and AD. Our results indicated that MCI indeed affected the predictive performance of AD diagnostic models. Of the three subgroups of MCI that we found, this finding was driven by a subgroup of MCI patients who likely have prodromal AD. This work highlights the importance of continuing to focus on better classification of the different types of MCI to improve diagnostic models of AD, rather than focusing on binary classifications between AD and control cases. Future research should focus on distinguishing MCI from prodromal AD as the utmost priority for improving translational AD diagnostic models for primary care physicians.

Identifiers

PMID42014714
PMCPMC13284375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.