ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
ERP effects at encoding: Image memorability or recognition success?
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The subsequent memory effect (SME) refers to neural patterns (e.g., in EEG or fMRI) at encoding that predict later memory performance. In N400-based SMEs, for example, items later remembered elicit less negative N400 amplitudes at encoding compared to items later forgotten. These effects have traditionally been interpreted as reflecting idiosyncratic neural states during encoding-in the case of the N400, states related to semantic activation-that influence episodic encoding success. However, recent work on memorability, a stable, item-level property indicating the population-level likelihood that an image will be remembered, has shown that high (compared to low) memorability images elicit less negative N400 amplitudes, suggesting that memorability is linked to more targeted semantic mapping. This raises the question of whether encoding-related effects are more tied to intrinsic stimulus properties or in-the-moment encoding variability. The present study examined both factors in tandem: ERPs were recorded while participants viewed images varying in memorability and were later classified by recognition outcome (hit vs. miss). Analyses revealed that N400 amplitudes were significantly predicted by memorability scores even when controlling for subsequent memory performance. Memorability also predicted Late Positive Complex SMEs. These findings suggest that neural activity traditionally associated with later memory success may capture item-level properties rather than transient encoding states. Consequently, memorability appears to be a key driver of differences in memory performance, challenging interpretations of SMEs as purely state-dependent and highlighting the importance of considering intrinsic stimulus characteristics when evaluating effects correlated with memory success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.