ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Detecting gaze shifts of moving observers in dynamic environments.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eye-tracking using head-mounted systems in natural, dynamic settings presents unique challenges for accurately detecting gaze shifts (saccades). Unlike controlled, screen-based scenarios, mobile eye-tracking involves constant shifts in visual scenes with respect to the head due to head and body movements, complicating gaze event classification. This paper systematically evaluates several threshold- and machine-learning-based gaze-shift detection algorithms on a manually labeled dataset collected from participants walking freely outdoors. Our findings indicate that conventional threshold-based methods, despite their sensitivity to parameter settings, outperform contemporary pre-trained machine learning methods when applied to real-world dynamic conditions without retraining. However, we also demonstrated that although machine-learning-based methods perform poorly on unseen dynamic data, their performance improves substantially when they are retrained on data that closely matches the testing conditions. Moreover, we introduce a novel probabilistic approach, the Ranking method, that integrates both eye movement and visual scene information, achieving performance comparable to inter-annotator agreement, outperforming previous methods. We also report observing some gaze behaviors during manual annotation that do not fit within the classical gaze event categories, highlighting why classifying gaze events in unconstrained natural scenarios is more complex than doing so for screen-based tasks. Our work provides insights suggesting how one could improve gaze event classification performance in real-world environments in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.