Article3D printing in medicine2026
Clinical implementation of an EU MDR-compliant point-of-care manufacturing framework for patient-specific 3D-printed PEEK implants in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.
Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Computer-Assisted Surgery to Extended Reality: Research Trends, Global Collaboration, and Future Directions in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2026Review
- Application-matched point-of-care 3D printing of functionalized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites for patient-specific craniomaxillofacial implants.3D printing in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoint-of-care (POC) three-dimensional (3D) printing of medical devices presents a paradigm shift in personalized medicine, yet clinical implementation of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants remains limited by regulatory, technical, and quality assurance challenges. Traditional external manufacturing timelines of 2–6 weeks constrain immediate reconstruction capabilities, particularly in trauma and oncologic cases requiring rapid intervention. Structured frameworks enabling MDR-compliant hospital-based production of implantable devices remain limited in the literature.
methodsWe implemented a comprehensive European Union Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR) 2017/745 Article 5(5)-compliant POC manufacturing framework incorporating an electronic quality management system aligned with ISO 13,485, a manufacturing execution system enabling end-to-end device traceability, risk management, process validation, biocompatibility evaluation, and integrated post-market surveillance. Medical-grade PEEK was processed using validated high-temperature specialised material extrusion 3D printers.
resultsRepresentative clinical applications of the EU MDR-compliant point-of-care manufacturing framework are illustrated in two anatomical contexts: (1) a POC 3D-printed PEEK cranial implant and (2) a POC 3D-printed PEEK facial implant. Manufacturing turnaround from image acquisition to sterile delivery was operationally achievable within 3–5 days. The patient-matched implants demonstrated accurate anatomical fit without intraoperative modification, with no major device-related complications observed. The framework has supported the production of over 40 + POC 3D-printed PEEK implants at the index institution and has since been adopted at multiple European centres, demonstrating transferability beyond the index case series.
conclusionsThis work describes a validated EU MDR Article 5(5)-compliant framework for hospital-based production of patient-matched 3D-printed PEEK implants, demonstrated across cranial and facial reconstruction. Early clinical results support safety and feasibility, with end-to-end manufacturing achievable within a week, enabling flexible surgical planning. The framework provides a replicable pathway for regulated POC implant production, with multi-centre adoption and long-term outcome surveillance as critical next steps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.