Observational studyScientific reports2026
Asymmetry of posterior pole remodeling in high myopia.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To characterize posterior pole morphology in high myopia using widefield OCT angiography (OCTA)–derived curvature metrics, with particular emphasis on asymmetry and regional variation, and to determine whether posterior deformation shows structured spatial patterns beyond conventional axial length and refractive measures. Dual–center, cross–sectional observational study. Widefield (24 × 20 mm) OCTA scans were used to derive posterior pole curvature maps. Posterior curvature heterogeneity was quantified using the posterior heterogeneity index (PHI slope), and directional asymmetry was quantified using the nasal–temporal difference in curvature slope (NT diff slope). Linear mixed–effects models accounting for inter–eye correlation were used to compare high myopia (defined as axial length ≥ 26.0 mm or spherical equivalent refraction ≤ − 6.00 D) with non–high myopia, adjusting for age, sex, eye laterality, and study center. Continuous associations with axial length were evaluated, and robustness was assessed across centers and sensitivity analyses. Eyes with discordant axial–refractive phenotypes were analyzed separately. Compared with non–high myopia eyes, high myopia eyes demonstrated significantly greater posterior curvature heterogeneity (PHI slope) and more pronounced nasal–temporal asymmetry (more negative NT diff slope), suggesting a spatially asymmetric pattern of posterior pole curvature. These associations remained significant after adjustment and were consistent across both study centers. Increasing axial length was continuously associated with higher PHI slope and more pronounced nasal–temporal asymmetry. Notably, eyes meeting refractive but not axial criteria for high myopia exhibited posterior pole morphology more similar to concordant high myopia eyes than to non–high myopia eyes, consistent with a structural–refractive dissociation. Key curvature indices showed high short–term repeatability. Posterior pole deformation in high myopia was associated with greater curvature heterogeneity and more pronounced nasal–temporal asymmetry, rather than a uniformly distributed pattern. Widefield OCTA–derived curvature metrics may provide a reproducible and clinically interpretable framework that complements conventional axial length and refractive assessment, particularly in eyes with discordant structural and refractive characteristics. Widefield OCTA–derived curvature mapping provides quantitative, reproducible descriptors of posterior pole remodeling that complement conventional measures of myopia severity (axial length and refraction). These interpretable morphology indices may help describe and compare structural variation across eyes with different axial–refractive profiles, particularly in those with discordant axial–refractive characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.