Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014570›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Detecting warning signs for psychopathology in real time while accounting for context: Two novel statistical process control applications.

M J Schreuder, E Schat, E Ceulemans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M J SchreuderQuantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. mariekeschreuder@gmail.com.
E SchatQuantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
E CeulemansQuantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 12AVE24NKU Leuven Research Council C14/23/062KU Leuven Research Council iBOF/21/090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical process control (SPC) may detect whether and when repeatedly assessed emotions reach unusual levels, which holds promise for the real-time detection of imminent depression. However, SPC does not account for contextual effects on emotions, such as people feeling systematically worse during stressful events and better during weekends. This may cause false alarms (e.g., presence of warning signs during stressful events) as well as false negatives (e.g., absence of warning signs during weekends). We therefore present two novel context-sensitive SPC methods, which adjust the monitored score according to contextual factors. A simulation study showed that these context-sensitive methods outperform the standard SPC method when contextual effects are large while the effect of depression on emotions is relatively small, but lose their advantage when contextual factors are biased. An empirical illustration confirmed these findings. Context-sensitive SPC methods are thus recommended when contextual factors can be accurately pinpointed, which may hold, for instance, for location and temporal cycles (seasons, menstrual cycles, week/weekend days).

Indexed as

DepressionEmotionsPsychopathologyComputer SimulationHumansEarly warning signsExperience samplingPersonalized predictionReal-time monitoringStatistical process control

Identifiers

PMID42014570
PMCPMC13099871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.