ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Evaluating the Efficacy of Dermabrasion, Fat Grafting, and Fibrous Septa Release: A Clinical Study.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive cosmetic procedures such as dermabrasion, fat grafting, and fibrous septa release have gained popularity for addressing various aesthetic concerns, including skin texture irregularities, volume loss, and cellulite. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with these procedures.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 150 patients who underwent dermabrasion, fat grafting, or fibrous septa release between January 2021 and December 2022. Patient data were obtained from hospital records and included demographic details, pre- and post-procedure photographs, complication rates, and patient satisfaction scores measured using the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Appearance Scale. Comparative statistical analyses were performed to evaluate outcomes.
resultsDermabrasion led to improvement in 86% (n = 43) of patients, primarily in skin texture and acne scars, with mild erythema observed in 12% (n = 6). Fat grafting yielded successful volume restoration in 90% (n = 45), with minor fat absorption in 8% (n = 4). Fibrous septa release improved cellulite appearance in 80% (n = 40) of patients, though 24% (n = 12) experienced transient bruising. Patient satisfaction scores were highest for fat grafting (mean = 8.9 ± 0.6), followed by dermabrasion (8.3 ± 0.9) and fibrous septa release (7.8 ± 1.1) (p = 0.03).
conclusionEach procedure demonstrated efficacy in treating specific aesthetic conditions. Dermabrasion is most effective for surface-level skin imperfections, fat grafting for volume enhancement, and fibrous septa release for cellulite reduction. All showed acceptable safety profiles and high patient satisfaction. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts and long-term follow-up are recommended to validate these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42014528What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.