Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014500›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Implementing an electronic health record workflow to identify parents with cancer and implications for supportive oncology care.

Kenneth P Tercyak, Marcelo M Sleiman, Ayaad Akand, Muriel R Statman, Rachel M Adams, Matthew G Biel, Kimberly M Davis, Rui Zhang, Jaeil Ahn, John L Marshall and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kenneth P TercyakLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, #300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA. tercyakk@georgetown.edu.
Marcelo M SleimanLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, #300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Ayaad AkandLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, #300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Muriel R StatmanLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, #300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Rachel M AdamsMedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Matthew G BielMedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Kimberly M DavisLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, #300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Rui ZhangLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, #300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Jaeil AhnLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, #300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
John L MarshallLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, #300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Arlen G GainesMedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Christina SharkeyLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, #300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS S NOEL · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeParents with cancer face unique psychosocial challenges as they navigate treatment while caring for dependent children, yet parenthood status is rarely captured in oncology workflows. This initiative evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of a new electronic health record (EHR)-based workflow to systematically identify parents with cancer and then connect them to family-focused assessment and supportive care.

methodsA two-phase quality improvement initiative was conducted at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center. Phase 1 included process mapping, analysis of tumor registry and distress screening data, and development of an EHR screening item assessing parenting status. Phase 2 implemented the item ("Patient is a parent/caregiver with child/ren < 22 years of age?") into oncology workflows, linking identified parents to a new supportive care program, Family Circle, which includes psychosocial assessment, navigation, and family-centered support. Training for oncology clinicians included in-service education. Analyses examined prevalence estimates and associations between parenting, distress, anxiety, and depression and reports of quality improvement metrics.

resultsAmong N = 2,172 screened patients, 20.6% identified as parents; the age-adjusted prevalence of parenting with children under 21 was 16.9%, consistent with national estimates. Parents reported significantly higher distress (odds ratio [OR] = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-1.64, p = 0.003) and anxiety (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.06-1.52, p = 0.009) than matched non-parents. Parents with younger children exhibited greater anxiety than those with older children (F = 4.32, df = 2, 393, p = .01). During implementation, N = 431 parents were identified in 6 months (79.4% through the EHR item).

conclusionEmbedding parenting status screening into the EHR is feasible, accurate, and critical for linking parents with cancer to supportive care. Wider implementation of such workflows may enhance psychosocial oncology practice and improve cancer parenting outcomes.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNeoplasmsParentsAdolescentAdultAnxietyChildChild, PreschoolDepressionFamily SupportFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentingCancerChildrenElectronic health recordParentsPsychosocial distressScreening

Identifiers

PMID42014500
PMCPMC13198706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.