ArticleEuropean radiology2026
From pixels to pathology: how artificial intelligence mammographic risk scores capture tumor biology through imaging.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo characterize clinical-pathologic tumor features associated with artificial intelligence (AI)-generated risk scores from prior-year screening mammograms. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included women who underwent breast biopsy following a screening mammogram in 2021 across four U.S. states. AI risk scores were obtained from prior-year screening mammograms using an FDA-approved AI model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative ability of AI risk scores. Among patients with breast cancer, linear regression was used to assess associations between prior-year risk scores and cancer characteristics.
resultsAmong 1509 patients included (mean age 58.56 ± 12.28 years), 508 (33.7%) had biopsy-confirmed breast cancer. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for prior-year AI risk score predicting biopsy-confirmed cancer was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.59-0.65). In univariate analysis of biopsy-positive patients, invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) had significantly higher prior-year AI risk scores than ductal carcinoma in situ (p = 0.009), while Grade 3 tumors had significantly lower scores than Grade 1 (p = 0.016). After adjusting for tumor grade, the ILC association was no longer significant (p = 0.136), suggesting that tumor grade may mediate this relationship; Grade 3 tumors showed a marginal association with lower risk scores (p = 0.068).
conclusionAI-generated risk scores from prior-year screening mammograms demonstrated modest discrimination between biopsy-confirmed malignant and non-malignant cases and may capture imaging features associated with low-grade tumors. Our findings suggest AI risk scores may reflect subtle imaging patterns of low-grade malignancy 1 year before clinical detection, thereby enhancing our understanding of AI model behavior and informing future research on clinical utility. KEY POINTS: Question What clinical-pathologic tumor characteristics are reflected in artificial intelligence (AI)-generated risk scores from prior-year screening mammograms among patients with biopsy-confirmed outcomes? Findings Prior-year AI risk scores demonstrated modest discrimination between biopsy-confirmed malignant and non-malignant cases and may capture imaging features associated with low-grade tumors. Clinical relevance AI-generated risk scores from prior-year screening mammograms may capture subtle imaging features of evolving low-grade malignancy 1 year before clinical detection, offering insights into AI model behavior, enhancing explainability for clinicians, and informing future research on clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.