Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014480›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026

Analyzing the landscape of "clean" products for textured hair at a Los Angeles Target.

Joaquín Madrid Larrañaga, Lariah Edwards, Robin E Dodson, Ami R Zota, Tianna Shaw Wakeman, Janette Robinson-Flint, Bhavna Shamasunder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joaquín Madrid LarrañagaEnvironmental Studies Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. joaquinml@ucsb.edu.
Lariah EdwardsDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Robin E DodsonSilent Spring Institute, Newton, MA, USA.
Ami R ZotaDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Tianna Shaw WakemanBlack Women for Wellness, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Janette Robinson-FlintBlack Women for Wellness, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Bhavna ShamasunderEnvironmental Studies Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemicals in haircare products have been linked with endocrine disruption, reproductive health harm, and carcinogenicity. As consumers transition to less chemically intensive hairstyles, they may seek out the "clean" hair product landscape. While large retailers such as Target have created "clean" branded sections to potentially improve transparency for consumers in a complex marketplace, there are no regulatory guidelines defining "clean" and the "clean" haircare market has not been systematically assessed for potential health and safety concerns.

objectiveTo assess ingredient hazards within the "clean" textured (curly, wavy, coily) haircare product landscape.

methodsWe web-scraped ingredient lists and other associated information for 150 products for textured hair from the "clean" category on the website for a specific Target store in South Los Angeles. We screened the ingredients for 18 chemicals of health concern (e.g., fragrance, phthalates) and linked the products to the Environmental Working Group's (EWG) Skin Deep® database to determine a product hazard score (1=least hazardous, 10=most hazardous).

resultsSeventy percent of products listed fragrance, an ingredient category of concern given limited ingredient transparency. Only 62 (41%) of products were listed in the EWG's Skin Deep® beauty product catalog and over 90% of listed products were classified by EWG as a 'moderate' risk to human health (product hazard scores between 3 and 6). SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that people who seek to manage natural hairstyles while avoiding exposure to harmful chemicals, navigate a confusing and unregulated marketplace. Inadequate federal regulation ensuring safety of personal care products does not ensure the safety of products in newer markets of "clean" branded products. Our findings suggest that harmonization of a definition of "clean" should be integrated across industry, from manufacturing to retail given existing inconsistencies that can create challenges for consumers who try to avoid harmful ingredients. IMPACT: There is a growing market of "clean" branded beauty products such as Target's "clean" beauty lines, which market products that exclude ingredients of concern, and thus potentially increase transparency for consumers. By analyzing 150 products for textured haircare found online at a Target store in Los Angeles and by linking products to EWG's Skin Deep® database hazard scores, we find limitations of such labeling schemes, including the continued existence of hazardous chemicals, potentially misleading marketing language, some inconsistent labeling, and potential negative impacts linked to racial and ethnic identities. Our findings underscore the need for consistency and transparency in labeling products as "clean" to reduce consumer uncertainty and improve product safety.

Indexed as

HairHair PreparationsConsumer Product SafetyHumansLos AngelesHair PreparationsClean beauty productsEndocrine disrupting chemicalsProduct marketingTarget CorporationTextured haircare productsWeb-scraping, Ingredients

Identifiers

PMID42014480
PMCPMC13331737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.