SynthesisEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
Monitoring the hyporheic zone: a global review and strategic directions for improvement.
Synthesis in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The hyporheic zone (HZ) is a crucial interface in riverbeds that links surface and subterranean waters, supporting a unique ecological community. While recent reviews have explored theoretical and ecological aspects of HZ, this study focuses on evaluating the advances in monitoring the quality and conservation status. We conducted a global systematic review, screening 16,135 articles and retaining a final data pool of 102 peer-reviewed studies published between 1989 and 2024. We address four main areas: (i) spatial and temporal distribution, (ii) monitoring activities, (iii) methodologies employed, and (iv) the impact of legislation. Despite advances in technical knowledge, HZ monitoring efforts remain quantitatively limited. Geographically, research is highly skewed, with Europe (51.0%), Asia (21.6%), and North America (19.6%) dominating the field, while other regions are severely underrepresented. Taxonomically, studies predominantly focus on the entire invertebrate community (35.5%) or microorganisms (30.3%), whereas efficient trait-based approaches remain scarce (6.6%). Methodologically, sampling is largely confined to shallow depths (up to - 50 cm). Furthermore, the enactment of environmental legislation showed a localized, rather than global, stimulus on monitoring outputs. This study emphasizes the urgent need for standardized methodologies, integrated surface-groundwater approaches, and targeted efforts to ensure effective water resource management. Finally, we propose a strategic roadmap with short-, medium-, and long-term actions to guide these improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.