ArticleScientific reports2026
mIT-CMCA: a cross-modal category alignment framework for robust maize disease identification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multimodal context-aware AI recommender for smart farming.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate identification of maize diseases is crucial for safeguarding global food security. Traditional image-based methods often struggle with lighting variations, occlusions, and noise, limiting their robustness and generalisation. Multimodal approaches that integrate visual and textual information have shown promise. However, these methods frequently require manually curated textual descriptions for each image, increasing data collection costs and limiting scalability and practical implementation. To address these limitations, we proposed a maize image-text framework with Cross-Modal Category Alignment (mIT-CMCA). This approach enforces category-level alignment between image and text modalities, enabling more accurate and interpretable cross-modal mapping. First, we construct cross-modal representations by aligning image and text modalities at the category level within a shared embedding space. Second, inspired by contrastive learning, we introduce a Cross-Modal Category Alignment (CMCA) loss based on category-level textual descriptions, reducing annotation complexity. Finally, we present an Efficient Channel-Spatial Hybrid Attention (CSHA) module that preserves inter-class boundaries while incurring minimal computational overhead, thereby enhancing feature discriminability under complex conditions. Experimental results on the maize subset of the PlantVillage dataset (MPVD) show that mIT-CMCA achieves 99.48% accuracy, 99.28% precision, 99.54% recall, and 99.41% F1-score. These results represent improvements of 0.24%, 0.13%, 0.17%, and 0.15% over the strongest vision-only baseline, MaxViT_tiny. On the self-built Maize Leaf-Field dataset (MLFD), the model achieves 93.67% accuracy, 93.76% precision, 93.67% recall, and 93.71% F1-score. It uses only 8.27 million parameters, which is 71.6% fewer than MaxViT_tiny. Its model size is 32.13 MB, which is 72.3% smaller. The proposed method also outperforms comparative models in robustness experiments under artificially added perturbations. These results demonstrate that mIT-CMCA achieves a favorable balance between accuracy and efficiency, making it suitable for practical agricultural deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.