ArticleScientific reports2026
Similar outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair alone in elderly patients with or without primary shoulder dislocation and Bankart lesion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical repair can effectively treat rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and Bankart lesions after shoulder dislocation. Bankart repair has been associated with potential complications such as glenohumeral arthritis, reduced external rotation, and axillary nerve injury. This study evaluated arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) outcomes in patients aged ≥ 60 years with RCTs and Bankart lesions after primary shoulder dislocation. Outcomes were compared with patients who had RCTss alone.This retrospective comparative study included patients who underwent ARCR without Bankart repair. Patients were segmented into two groups based on their diagnoses. Group I comprised patients with RCTs and Bankart lesions with a history of shoulder dislocation. Group II comprised patients with RCTs alone and who were matched to those in group I. Pain reduction, functional recovery, and active range of motion were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Ten shoulders (10 patients) and 30 matched shoulders (30 patients) were segmented into group I and group II, respectively. All patients completed a 24-month postoperative follow-up evaluation. Patients in group I did not experience re-dislocation after surgery and had a higher level of improvement in active forward flexion than group II at 24-month follow-up (172.2 ± 8.5 versus 163.8 ± 31.7, p = 0.045). The two groups did not differ in any other relevant parameters. In patients aged ≥ 60 with RCTs and Bankart lesions who have experienced shoulder dislocation, performing an ARCR without Bankart repair can lead to similar satisfactory outcomes to those seen in patients with RCTs alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.