ArticleScientific reports2026
LLM-enabled adaptive scheduling in IoT sensing for optimized network performance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of numerous sensors on edge devices, combined with the emergence of AI techniques, makes the IoT environment more intelligent and interactive. The resulting paradigm encompasses device-centric systems that operate instantly and remotely with zero clicks. However, with these advantages, many functional challenges affect remote sensing, including incomplete data, communication delay, lack of context awareness, and dynamically switching topology. To address these challenges, we have proposed a novel scheme, "LLM-Enabled Adaptive Scheduling in IoT Sensing for Optimized Network Performance (LLM-AS)." This scheme uses LLM to adjust the system's sensing to avoid redundant and useless data sending and enhance decision-making for optimized network resources. First, LLM-AS is trained with a defined data set for different parameters, such as packet loss trends, time-based fluctuations, event triggers, network failure patterns, and congestion signals with contextual decisions. Then, this scheme is deployed in a dynamic remote monitoring system for learning and updating task descriptions to utilize the feedback for future decisions and enhance the system performance. Evaluation of LLM-AS on various parameters using the CASAS dataset shows that the optimization functions of LLM are useful and make the IoT more usable. The LLM-AS optimization function confirms an improvement of 57.8% to 60% in MTP, a decrease of 26% to 60% in median delay, and an optimized energy solution with a confidence interval of 95% and a very small error margin. It also indicates that the precision score is about 0.86, the recall score is about 0.82, and the RMSE is about 0.21; all these values suggest high separability for varying conditions of IoT systems in dynamically changing situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.