Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014355›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026

Large-scale experimental evaluation of woody plant removal in desert grassland: Restoration, novelty, or degradation?

Brandon T Bestelmeyer, Laura M Burkett, Darren James, Juan Gamon, Robert L Schooley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Large-scale experimental evaluation of woody plant removal in desert grassland: Restoration, novelty, or degradation?Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brandon T BestelmeyerUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5060-9955
Laura M BurkettUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA.
Darren JamesUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA.
Juan GamonLas Cruces District Office, USDI Bureau of Land Management, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA.
Robert L SchooleyDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA.

Funding

BLMDivision of Environmental Biology 2025166National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2016-67019-25212USDA Agricultural Research Service
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Woody plant encroachment into grassy ecosystems is a worldwide phenomenon that radically transforms ecosystem services. Billions of dollars have been spent to remove woody plants, but there is great uncertainty about the conditions in which such removals are beneficial. We conducted a collaborative, large-scale monitoring experiment in the Chihuahuan Desert of southern New Mexico, USA, to test whether woody plant removal restored historical states, created novel states, or exacerbated land degradation and to examine the environmental conditions affecting outcomes. We monitored vegetation cover in 43 pairs of plots representing herbicide-treated and herbicide-untreated conditions of the same plant community and environmental setting, including measurements at baseline, 5, 10, and in some cases 15 years posttreatment. We compared outcomes to measurements in reference sites. Woody plant removal led to increases in plant species richness and perennial grass cover, but increases were due to disturbance-adapted grasses rather than species characteristic of reference states. On average, grass cover in treatments did not attain levels observed in the reference state. Negative effects of woody plant removal on total canopy cover (related to soil erosion risk) and other plant functional groups of concern for wildlife were not observed. Elevation, slope, and baseline cover were important predictors of treatment-associated gains in plant cover, while higher grazing intensity was related to increases in richness and forb cover. Our results indicate that while woody plant removal cannot be considered to restore a reference state due to the continued absence of reference grass species, it does not lead to obvious land degradation. Furthermore, more positive outcomes are maximized where (and when) soil moisture limitations are lowest or the cover of responding plants is highest prior to treatments. We recommend that future restoration actions be conducted as experiments that pay special attention to co-production mechanisms, standardized monitoring methods, and salient and easily measured indicators.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesDesert ClimateEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationGrasslandPoaceaeEnvironmental MonitoringHerbicidesNew MexicoHerbicidesgrasslands; grazingherbicide; long‐term monitoringperennial grassesrestorationshrub encroachment

Identifiers

PMID42014355
PMCPMC13099281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.