ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026
Abiotic Hydrolysis of Microplastics: Influence of Polymer Chain Scission on Particle Fragmentation and Dissolved Organic Carbon Release.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how plastics degrade and fragment, releasing microplastics, nanoplastics, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), is crucial for their risk assessment. This study assesses abiotic hydrolytic aging of polymer powders (40-700 μm) under OECD guideline conditions and in simulated seawater from 4 to 65 °C (accelerated aging) over 10, 100, and up to 365 days. Chain scission, recrystallization, fragmentation, and dissolution of microplastics were examined for polyamide-6 (PA-6), thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), polypropylene (PP), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), and polylactic acid (PLA). Microplastics (1-190 μm) mainly formed through surface cracking, whereas nanoplastics (0.01-1 μm) arose from particle shrinkage and erosion. Polymer chemistry strongly influenced the release patterns, with total degradation and release ranking LDPE < TPU < PA-6 < PLA; stabilized PP ranked lowest, as expected. TPU and LDPE underwent limited hydrolysis but measurable thermo-oxidative modification. PA-6 and PLA were both prone to degradation under high temperatures and specific pH, but with distinct behaviors: PLA showed substantial bulk dissolution, producing diverse DOC species over time, whereas PA-6 released a smaller and temporally stable DOC pool; both polymers fragmented. Overall, abiotic hydrolysis drives interconnected fragmentation and dissolution processes, with release dynamics depending on polymer type and environmental conditions. The resulting data support mechanistic modeling of microplastic fragmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.