Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42013896›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2026

From Pilot to Practice: A Sociotechnical Perspective for Sustainable Adoption of Patient Engagement Technologies.

Prashila Dullabh, Courtney Zott, Nicole Gauthreaux, Abigail Aronoff, Dean F Sittig, Aziz Boxwala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Prashila DullabhHealth Sciences Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Washington, District of Columbia, United States.
Courtney ZottHealth Sciences Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Washington, District of Columbia, United States.
Nicole GauthreauxHealth Sciences Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Washington, District of Columbia, United States.
Abigail AronoffHealth Sciences Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Washington, District of Columbia, United States.
Dean F SittigInformatics Review LLC, Lake Oswego, Oregon, United States.
Aziz BoxwalaElimu Informatics, El Cerrito, California, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite widespread investment in patient engagement technologies-such as mobile apps, chatbots, and remote monitoring tools-few have achieved sustained adoption or integration into clinical workflows. The persistent gap between pilot success and real-world scalability reflects not only technical barriers but also sociotechnical challenges involving people, processes, and policy. Objectives: This study aimed to identify cross-cutting barriers and enablers of implementation across multiple real-world pilots of patient engagement technologies and extend the Sociotechnical Model (STM) of Health Information Technology (IT) to explicitly incorporate patient perspectives and lived experiences as determinants of adoption and sustainability. Methods: Drawing on our team's formal evaluations of implementing patient engagement technologies across four U.S. health systems-including applications for coronavirus disease 2019, hypertension, medication adherence, and chatbot-supported communication-we synthesized lessons learned across eight STM domains: hardware/software, clinical content, human-computer interface, people, workflow and communication, organizational policies, external pressures, and system monitoring. Results: Eight cross-cutting lessons emerged: (1) effective leadership and collaboration across clinicians, IT and informatics teams, patients, and electronic health record and app developers are essential; (2) uneven standards adoption and support continues to limit interoperability; (3) success depends on skilled technical resources with expertise in interoperability standards; (4) engage patients in codesign processes early and throughout; (5) sustained patient engagement requires structured onboarding and feedback loops; (6) account for diverse patient needs and preferences during the design; (7) clinician workflows must be redesigned to integrate and act on patient-contributed data without increasing burden; and (8) demonstrated return on investment is needed to justify long-term costs of maintenance. Conclusion: Sustaining patient engagement technologies requires expanding the sociotechnical lens to include patients' lifeflows alongside organizational and technical factors. Future implementation, research, and policy efforts should focus on collaborative leadership models, patient-centered engagement processes, enhanced interoperability, clear data monitoring workflows, and financial sustainability.

Indexed as

Medical InformaticsPatient ParticipationCOVID-19Digital HealthHumansPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID42013896
PMCPMC13099257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.