Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42013888›Full record

ArticleMethods of information in medicine2025

Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Population Dynamics of the Biological Vector Aedes Aegypti.

Alexandra Schwaiger, Marco Schweitzer, Werner O Hackl, Bernhard Pfeifer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods of information in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra SchwaigerDivision for Digital Health and Telemedicine, UMIT TIROL, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Marco SchweitzerDivision for Digital Health and Telemedicine, UMIT TIROL, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Werner O HacklDivision for Digital Health and Telemedicine, UMIT TIROL, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Bernhard PfeiferDivision for Digital Health and Telemedicine, UMIT TIROL, Hall in Tirol, Austria.

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Climate, Energy and Mobility 101155958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The invasive mosquito Objective: As a first step toward a transmission model for vector-borne diseases, a weather-dependent population dynamic simulation for Methods: We developed an agent-based model, incorporating temperature- and precipitation-dependent development, mortality, movement, feeding behavior, and egg-laying. Species-specific parameters were derived from published experimental studies. Simulations were run for observed weather data from 2024 and for EURO-CORDEX climate projections (ÖKS15) for 2050 and 2080 under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. Daily immigration of one adult female was assumed to mimic human-mediated introduction along major transport routes. Results: Under all scenarios, population development began in late May and ceased by late September. Observed 2024 conditions produced the highest population sizes (area under the curve [AUC] = 361,343 individuals), whereas all future projections resulted in substantially lower abundances, despite higher mean temperatures. Conclusion: This discrepancy was driven by stronger fluctuations in temperature and precipitation, as well as the absence of urban heat-island effects in climate projections. Under no scenario did mosquitoes survive winter, indicating that long-term establishment is highly unlikely. The model provides a foundation for future extension toward spatially explicit virus transmission simulations, and for assessing the public health implications of climate change in alpine regions.

Indexed as

AedesInsect VectorsModels, BiologicalMosquito VectorsAnimalsAustriaComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMosquito-Borne DiseasesPopulation DynamicsTemperatureWeather

Identifiers

PMID42013888
PMCPMC13493185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.