ArticleChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry2026
Beyond Classical Force Fields: Physics-Driven Assessment of the Grappa Machine-Learned Force Field on the FoldBind Dataset.
Article in Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physics-based approaches rely on accurate force fields and efficient sampling to provide mechanistic insight into biomolecular systems. Recent AI-driven advances are transforming this landscape, replacing empirically fitted force fields-built from manually curated atom types-with machine-learned models. Achieving interoperability between these new force fields and established sampling strategies-and validating them on challenging benchmark sets that extend far beyond near-native states-is essential for progress in the field. To this end, we introduce the FoldBind benchmark set, a collection of 18 systems encompassing 14 protein-folding cases and 4 peptide-protein complexes that undergo folding upon binding. This suite expands existing validation efforts by probing both conformational transitions and binding-induced folding, offering a rigorous test for sampling methods and force-field accuracy alike. To explore these systems, we employ the Modeling Employing Limited Data (MELD) framework as the sampling engine. MELD accelerates conformational exploration by integrating ambiguous or noisy physical restraints-for example, the general expectation that proteins form hydrophobic cores-within a Bayesian inference formalism. By balancing exploration (broad conformational search) and exploitation (stabilization of structures consistent with physics and data), MELD efficiently accesses native-like states that are otherwise inaccessible to conventional molecular dynamics. Under identical data conditions, the quality of the force field determines which states are stabilized and whether the correct native basin emerges. Furthermore, the ability of a force field to consistently stabilize the native basin among multiple data-compatible states provides an additional measure of its physical realism. Together, this FoldBind benchmark, along with the information used in MELD, can be used to test and distinguish future force field development efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.