Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42013852›Full record

Trial reportCell reports. Medicine2026

Stereotactic body radiotherapy plus sunitinib vs. sunitinib alone in treatment-naive oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma: A phase 2 clinical trial.

Yang Liu, Xin-Yue Zhang, Wen-Su Wei, Rui-Qi Liu, Qi-Wen Pan, Yi-Jun Zhang, Ji-Bin Li, Yu-Lu Peng, Ting-Xuan Huang, Zhi-Ling Zhang and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cell reports. Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yang LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Xin-Yue ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Wen-Su WeiDepartment of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Rui-Qi LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Qi-Wen PanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yi-Jun ZhangDepartment of Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Ji-Bin LiDepartment of Clinical Research Methodology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yu-Lu PengDepartment of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Ting-Xuan HuangDepartment of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Zhi-Ling ZhangDepartment of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Hui HanDepartment of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Sheng-Jie GuoDepartment of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Jian-Ming GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Fang-Jian ZhouDepartment of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: zhoufj@sysucc.org.cn.
Pei DongDepartment of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: dongpei@sysucc.org.cn.
Li-Ru HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: helir@sysucc.org.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative data on stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is lacking. This single-center, phase 2 non-randomized controlled trial enrolls patients with treatment-naive oligometastatic RCC. Patients choose to receive sunitinib alone (control arm, n = 24) or plus SBRT (SBRT arm, n = 24). The primary endpoint, objective response rate (83.3% vs. 29.2%; p < 0.001), is higher in the SBRT arm. With a median follow-up of 40.6 months, the 1-year local control rate is 91.5%. Progression-free survival (PFS) is significantly longer in the SBRT arm (17.3 vs. 6.3 months; p = 0.036). Post hoc multivariable analysis shows that SBRT significantly prolongs PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.84; p = 0.015). Grade 3 toxicities are similar (54.2% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.773). The SBRT arm shows a trend toward better quality of life. These suggest potential benefit of SBRT in oligometastatic RCC, requiring further validation by phase 3 trials. The trial is registered at Chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1800017136).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsRadiosurgerySunitinibAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProgression-Free SurvivalTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsSunitinibmetastasis-directed therapyoligometastaticrenal cell carcinomastereotactic body radiotherapysunitinib

Identifiers

PMID42013852
PMCPMC13198230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.