ArticleCell reports. Medicine2026
Distinct signatures in the human gut and oral microbiomes of gastric cancer.
Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metagenomics in the Interplay Among Oral and Gut Dysbiosis.Metabolites · 2026Review
- From commensal to pathogen: recent advances in the pathogenicity and clinical implications ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Herbal Medicine and the Gastrointestinal Microbiota in Gastric Precancerous Lesions and Gastric Cancer: Mechanistic Evidence and Translational Challenges.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiome dysbiosis is increasingly recognized as a hallmark of gastric cancer (GC). Here, we analyzed gut and oral shotgun metagenomic data from 317 individuals across two independent cohorts, with validation in a Harbin cohort. We identify 20 oral-gut shared species enriched in the gut of GC, predominantly lactic acid bacteria (LAB). While most gut microbial markers are abundant in saliva, none are significantly altered in GC. Strain-level analysis of 87 matched saliva-stool metagenomes confirms oral-gut transmission of Streptococcus species. GC-enriched LAB form robust co-abundance networks in oral and gut microbiomes, suggesting synergistic interactions. Functional analysis reveals enriched lactate fermentation pathways in GC stool, aligning with LAB dominance and previous findings on gastric microbiota. Moreover, microbiome-based classifiers achieve high predictive accuracy (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.85 for stool, 0.87 for saliva) for GC diagnosis, highlighting translational potential. Collectively, these findings underscore the critical role of the oral-gut microbiome axis in GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.