ArticleInternational dental journal2026
A Dynamic Study of Mandibular Movement Trajectories in Patients With Disc Displacement Without Reduction.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsMandibular movement is a complex physiological process essential for orofacial function. Patients with disc displacement without reduction (DDWoR) exhibit significant kinematic impairments, which are thought to arise from structural joint damage and neuromuscular dysregulation. This study characterised mandibular movement in DDWoR using the Jaw Motion Analyzer. Through quantitative trajectory analysis and principal component analysis, we identified the primary variation patterns in mandibular kinematics. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of key movement parameters. This work provides a basis for functional movement-based assessment and objective diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders.
methodsThis case-control study enrolled 40 DDWoR patients and 20 matched healthy controls. Mandibular movement trajectories were recorded using the Zebris Jaw Motion Analyzer system during standardised tasks. Trajectory symmetry was analysed via mathematical programming. Statistical analyses included group comparisons, principal component analysis and ROC curve evaluation to identify diagnostic kinematic indicators.
resultsDDWoR patients exhibited significant kinematic alterations compared to healthy controls. Bilateral DDWoR patients showed reduced protrusive and opening movement ranges. In contrast, unilateral DDWoR patients demonstrated relatively asymmetrical patterns characterised by asymmetric condylar trajectories with increased lateral excursion ranges. Principal component analysis between the bilateral DDWoR group and the healthy group revealed 2 dominant variation patterns explaining 53.69% of total variance. ROC analysis identified excellent diagnostic value for sagittal opening symmetry (AUC = 0.901) and good value for incisal point inclination (AUC = 0.813).
conclusionOur findings confirm distinctive and heterogeneous mandibular movement patterns in DDWoR, revealing several parameters with diagnostic potential to inform functional assessment and personalised treatment strategies for temporomandibular disorder. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study identifies specific mandibular movement signatures in DDWoR patients, providing objective kinematic parameters for functional assessment. These findings facilitate early diagnosis, enable real-time treatment monitoring and support the development of personalised rehabilitation strategies for temporomandibular disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.