Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42013469›Full record

ArticleScience progress

MHBDS: Healthcare blockchain data sharing scheme based on SMPC and TRP-PBFT.

Lihua Zhang, Jiali Luo, Zhichen Hao, Qianqian Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lihua ZhangSchool of Information and Software Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5353-6875
Jiali LuoSchool of Information and Software Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, China.
Zhichen HaoSchool of Information and Software Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, China.
Qianqian YangSchool of Information and Software Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decentralized and immutable nature of blockchain technology offers promising avenues for secure healthcare data sharing among legitimate institutions. However, current blockchain systems face critical bottlenecks in handling large volumes of medical data, low storage efficiency, and vulnerabilities in security. To overcome these challenges, a novel healthcare blockchain data-sharing scheme integrating Secure Multi-party Computation (SMPC) is proposed. To mitigate the risk of data leaks resulting from key compromise, Blakley's secret sharing technique is employed for key distribution management, and Ciphertext-Policy Attribute-Based Encryption (CP-ABE) is integrated for access control. To address the challenge of handling large data on the chain, data that needs to be uploaded to the blockchain is encoded and fragmented using erasure coding techniques. Additionally, a Byzantine Fault Tolerance mechanism based on Reputation and Polling verification (TRP-PBFT) is introduced to enhance data sharing efficiency and system robustness. Simulation experiments conducted on platforms like Fabric demonstrate that this solution improves data sharing efficiency while ensuring data confidentiality and integrity. In comparison to Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) under similar conditions, TRP-PBFT reduces the average latency from 655.42 ms to 342.22 ms and increases the average throughput from 107.31 TPS to 143.45 TPS. The scheme maintains high throughput and offers relatively stable latency performance.

Indexed as

BlockchainComputer SecurityInformation DisseminationConfidentialityHumansblockchaindata sharingsecure multiparty computingsmart healthcare

Identifiers

PMID42013469
PMCPMC13111841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.