ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Autoencoder-Enhanced Convolutional Neural Networks for Plantar Pressure-Based Gait Pattern Recognition: Model Development and Cross-Validated Evaluation Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlantar pressure imaging is a stable modality that reflects gait-related biomechanical characteristics and has been used increasingly for gait assessment and recognition. However, plantar pressure images are high dimensional and nonlinear, making manual feature engineering and conventional machine learning insufficient to capture discriminative patterns.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop a gait pattern recognition model based on plantar pressure using an autoencoder (AE)-enhanced convolutional neural network (CNN) and to evaluate its performance against baseline deep learning and classical machine learning approaches.
methodsA total of 13 healthy volunteers (aged 18-24 years) were recruited. Plantar pressure data were collected during treadmill walking using an in-shoe pressure measurement system and converted into frame-wise plantar pressure images. We compared a lightweight CNN (Light CNN), an AE-CNN cascade model, and an encoder-augmented CNN with an additional bottleneck layer. Model development used participant-wise data partitioning, and performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F
resultsThe proposed encoder-augmented CNN achieved the best overall performance (F
conclusionsIntegrating representation learning (AE-based compression) with CNN-based classification improved the recognition of gait patterns from plantar pressure images. This pilot study included only healthy participants. Future work should validate generalizability in larger and clinically diverse cohorts and further investigate participant-level evaluation and model interpretability, as well as deployment feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.