ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2026
Factors Affecting Acceptance of Life Education in Mainland China: National Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Attitudes toward death and associated factors among older adults in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In traditional Chinese culture, discussing death has always been taboo. The social environment characterized by fear, reluctance, and apprehension toward death significantly impedes the development of palliative care. Therefore, establishing a correct view of life and death and promoting life education are prerequisites for the successful implementation of palliative care. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the public acceptance of life education among individuals in China and analyze the explanatory variables. Methods: This national cross-sectional study was conducted from June 20 to August 31, 2022, encompassing 23 provinces, 5 autonomous regions, and 4 municipalities directly under the central government. A total of 21,875 participants were included. The generalized linear model was used to analyze influencing factors. Gender, major in medicine, place of residence, education level, family health, media use, etc, were analyzed as the potential variables. Acceptance scores were calculated based on a visual analog scale (VAS). Further subgroup analyses were carried out in different age and major subgroups. Results: The median (P25, P75) acceptance score for life education in the survey was 71.00 (50.00-95.00) points. Compared with females, males had lower acceptance (β=-2.39; 95% CI -3.08 to -1.69). Respondents who were majoring in medicine (β=3.13; 95% CI 1.11-5.14), residing in urban areas (β=1.25; 95% CI 0.46-2.04), processing a bachelor's degree or higher (β=4.05; 95% CI 2.97-5.12), or having higher scores on the media use (β=0.49; 95% CI 0.41-0.57) had higher acceptance. Compared with people aged 12-17 years, those aged 25-44 years (β=-6.00; 95% CI -7.34 to -4.66), aged 45-64 years (β=-4.55; 95% CI -5.88 to -3.22), and 65 years or older (β=-2.16; 95% CI -3.78 to -0.55) had lower acceptance. For people majoring in medicine, place of residence, family health, and media use were uniquely relevant factors. Higher scores on the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) and Health Literacy Scale-Short Form (HLS-SF) were also significantly associated with greater acceptance of life education. Conclusions: Gender, place of residence, education level, age, media use, perceived social support, and health literacy were identified as key factors influencing acceptance of life education, providing important evidence to inform targeted policy and educational interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.