Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42013434›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2026

Factors Affecting Acceptance of Life Education in Mainland China: National Cross-Sectional Study.

Xinyue Zhang, Nana Huang, Yuyang Yi, Yinlin Wang, Wai-Kit Ming, Yibo Wu, Xiaohong Ning, Chen Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinyue Zhang *School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 9, Dongdansantiao Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China, 86-10-65120199.ORCID 0000-0003-2669-0911
Nana Huang *Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0009-0000-7039-9115
Yuyang Yi *Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0009-0002-5480-7304
Yinlin WangKey Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8519-7399
Wai-Kit MingDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-8846-7515
Yibo WuDepartment of Nursing, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9607-313X
Xiaohong NingPalliative Care Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0002-2092-246X
Chen WangSchool of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 9, Dongdansantiao Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China, 86-10-65120199.ORCID 0000-0001-7857-5435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In traditional Chinese culture, discussing death has always been taboo. The social environment characterized by fear, reluctance, and apprehension toward death significantly impedes the development of palliative care. Therefore, establishing a correct view of life and death and promoting life education are prerequisites for the successful implementation of palliative care. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the public acceptance of life education among individuals in China and analyze the explanatory variables. Methods: This national cross-sectional study was conducted from June 20 to August 31, 2022, encompassing 23 provinces, 5 autonomous regions, and 4 municipalities directly under the central government. A total of 21,875 participants were included. The generalized linear model was used to analyze influencing factors. Gender, major in medicine, place of residence, education level, family health, media use, etc, were analyzed as the potential variables. Acceptance scores were calculated based on a visual analog scale (VAS). Further subgroup analyses were carried out in different age and major subgroups. Results: The median (P25, P75) acceptance score for life education in the survey was 71.00 (50.00-95.00) points. Compared with females, males had lower acceptance (β=-2.39; 95% CI -3.08 to -1.69). Respondents who were majoring in medicine (β=3.13; 95% CI 1.11-5.14), residing in urban areas (β=1.25; 95% CI 0.46-2.04), processing a bachelor's degree or higher (β=4.05; 95% CI 2.97-5.12), or having higher scores on the media use (β=0.49; 95% CI 0.41-0.57) had higher acceptance. Compared with people aged 12-17 years, those aged 25-44 years (β=-6.00; 95% CI -7.34 to -4.66), aged 45-64 years (β=-4.55; 95% CI -5.88 to -3.22), and 65 years or older (β=-2.16; 95% CI -3.78 to -0.55) had lower acceptance. For people majoring in medicine, place of residence, family health, and media use were uniquely relevant factors. Higher scores on the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) and Health Literacy Scale-Short Form (HLS-SF) were also significantly associated with greater acceptance of life education. Conclusions: Gender, place of residence, education level, age, media use, perceived social support, and health literacy were identified as key factors influencing acceptance of life education, providing important evidence to inform targeted policy and educational interventions.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathHealth EducationAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesaffecting factorscross-sectional studylife educationpersonal intentionpublic education

Identifiers

PMID42013434
PMCPMC13100709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.