ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026
The Flow of Healthcare Information in Rural and Remote Settings: A Qualitative Approach.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Flow of Healthcare Information in Rural and Remote Settings: A Qualitative Approach.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleConnected healthcare delivery ensures that the right healthcare information is exchanged with the right healthcare workers, at the right time. Due to the vast distances and dispersed workforce, achieving connected healthcare across rural and remote settings remains a global challenge. Workforce perspectives may help understand how digital transformation can contribute to consumer-centered healthcare information flow. AIMS AND
objectivesTo answer the research question: how consumer-centered is the healthcare information flow across rural and remote health services?
methodA qualitative study was conducted involving semi-structured interviews with staff (n = 57) from rural and remote healthcare systems (n = 6). Transcripts were analyzed to elicit the current state of information exchange between and within health services and associated themes. The findings were evaluated with a subject matter expert and member checking.
resultsThe mode of healthcare information flow was largely paper-based, however frequent use of hybrid (paper and digital records) and digital Clinical Information Systems (CISs) was evident. Transferability of healthcare information could be improved as some systems lack sufficient communication with CISs in other health service types. Resourcing and workforce capabilities were identified to limit transparency of healthcare information. Provided adequate support was available, the rural and remote healthcare workforce support digital transformation and encourage the expansion of digital CISs.
conclusionDigital transformation and better integration of CISs can enable a healthcare information journey that is consumer-centered, ensuring secure, reliable, and efficient exchange of information. Specific recommendations include the expansion of digital health information exchange applications, enhancing local digital infrastructure support, and building a digitally skilled workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.