ArticleJMIR human factors2026
"Helpful in Thinking Through the Question": Redesigning the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 for Depression Assessment to Enhance Patient Engagement and Understanding.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent and impairing mental health condition characterized by persistent low mood and diminished energy. Self-report instruments, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), are frequently used in clinical and research settings for depression assessment. Objective: We developed, redesigned, and tested 2 alternative versions of the PHQ-8 that incorporate visual elements and reframed statements aimed at improving acceptability and comprehension. Methods: In a mixed methods study, 20 participants with high subclinical to moderately severe depressive symptoms provided feedback after completing 3 versions: the standard PHQ-8 form, our version augmented with visual aids, and our version that combined visual aids with rephrased item statements for greater clarity and engagement. Results: Eighty percent (16/20) of participants preferred one of the augmented PHQ-8 versions over the standard questionnaire (P=.006). Conclusions: Participants reported that the augmented versions improved their understanding of survey items, reduced response burden, and increased engagement, suggesting that visual and linguistic design modifications may enhance the patient experience in depression screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.