Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42013174›Full record

Observational studyPLoS medicine2026

Quality of antenatal and delivery care and postnatal care use: A multi-country observational study of 400,000 births.

Jan E Cooper, Hwa-Young Lee, Katherine Wright, Prashant Jaryan, Margaret E Kruk

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jan E CooperDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-9050
Hwa-Young LeeGraduate School of Public Health and Healthcare Management, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2591-1436
Katherine WrightDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Prashant JaryanCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5020-3995
Margaret E KrukDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9549-8432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostnatal care (PNC) plays a crucial role in averting newborn mortality, yet its use remains low, particularly in regions with the highest mortality. While demographic and social determinants of PNC use have been well studied and have informed current strategies focused on changing care-seeking behaviors, the stagnating decline in neonatal mortality highlights the need for upstream and system-wide approaches to increase PNC uptake. Limited evidence exists to guide system-level reforms; therefore, we investigated whether health systems that ensure high-quality perinatal care are associated with increased use of PNC. METHODS AND

findingsWe performed a cross-sectional observational study using Demographic and Health Survey data from 38 countries that had not met SDG neonatal mortality targets by 2020. The study population comprised women aged 15-49 years whose most recent live birth occurred within five years preceding the survey. We employed logistic regression models with country fixed effects to examine associations between: (1) perinatal service utilization, (2) service quality; and their relationship with postnatal checkups for newborns within 28 days. We analyzed utilization-quality interactions to determine how the effects of service coverage on PNC use varied by care quality and conducted wealth-stratified analyses to assess how quality effects on PNC use differed across socioeconomic groups. High-quality perinatal care was associated with a 2-fold increase in the probability of postnatal checkups within 28 days (0.406 in the highest quality tertile versus 0.221 in the lowest quality tertile). For mothers who received the lowest tertile of service quality, full utilization of perinatal services yielded negligible changes in postnatal checkup probability (0.217 to 0.216). Conversely, for mothers who received the highest quality of antenatal and perinatal care, full access to perinatal care improved the probability of postnatal check-ups (0.392 to 0.428). Notably, women in the lowest wealth quintile experienced a substantial increase in postnatal checkup probability from 0.224 to 0.481 between low and high-quality care cohorts, while this differential was less pronounced in the highest wealth quintile (0.236 to 0.450). Key limitations include restricted quality indicators, potential recall bias from self-reported measures, limited information on follow-up care, and the cross-sectional nature of the data, which limits causal interpretation.

conclusionsOur interaction analysis reveals a critical insight: high-quality care substantially enhanced the magnitude of the association between expanded perinatal service use and PNC use, whereas increased utilization alone was not linked to higher PNC uptake. Notably, the impact of improved care quality was most pronounced among the lowest wealth groups, highlighting its potential as a mechanism for promoting equity. By demonstrating the central role of care quality in promoting PNC utilization, particularly among disadvantaged populations, our findings suggest that improving health system quality could be a more effective strategy for achieving universal maternal healthcare coverage than traditional access-focused approaches.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricPostnatal CarePrenatal CareQuality of Health CareAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPregnancyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42013174
PMCPMC13098959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.