Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42013159›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2026

Epigenetic gene regulation is controlled by distinct regulatory complexes utilizing specialized paralogs of TELOMERE REPEAT BINDING FACTORS.

Maik Mendler, Kristin Krause, Simone Zündorf, Prathamesh Sannak, Petra Tänzler, Sara Stolze, Hirofumi Nakagami, Franziska Turck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maik MendlerDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7645-0027
Kristin KrauseDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany.
Simone ZündorfDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany.
Prathamesh SannakDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3773-8360
Petra TänzlerDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany.
Sara StolzeDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1421-9703
Hirofumi NakagamiDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2569-7062
Franziska TurckDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4982-5949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic regulators shape chromatin landscapes, allowing cells to express distinct gene sets depending on cell-type, developmental stage or environmental cues. These regulatory complexes rely on interactions with sequence-specific DNA binding proteins, such as the small family of TELOMERE REPEAT BINDING FACTORS (TRBs). TRBs are components of chromatin regulatory complexes with opposing functions, such as the epigenetic repressors Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) and a JMJ14/NAC complex that respectively add and removes the repressive H3K27me3 and positive H3K4me3 modification, but also with the plant-specific PEAT complex that is linked to histone acetylation and gene activation. We dissected the partial redundancy between TRB1, TRB2 and TRB3 in target gene selection and interaction with different chromatin regulatory complexes. High redundancy of TRBs is suggested by major phenotypic changes that are only observed trb triple mutants; however, we found different target site preference between TRB1-3 and preferred partnership with chromatin complexes. Furthermore, TRB paralogs interacted with the NuA4 histone acetylation complex, both together with and in absence of PEAT. Among the three paralogs, TRB1 had more unique binding sites and correlated stronger with PEAT and NuA4 functions. In contrast, TRB2 and TRB3 were more dependent on the presence of bona fide telo-box motifs and were more likely to be found at PRC2 associated sites. Overall, we provide insight into the diverse roles of TRBs in epigenetic gene regulation and how their diversification contributes to their apparent redundancy, as well as their observed activating and repressing effects on gene expression.

Indexed as

Arabidopsis ProteinsEpigenesis, GeneticTelomere-Binding ProteinsAcetylationArabidopsisChromatinGene Expression Regulation, PlantHistonesPolycomb Repressive Complex 2TelomereArabidopsis ProteinsChromatinHistonesPolycomb Repressive Complex 2Telomere-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID42013159
PMCPMC13132431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.