ArticlePloS one2026
Irrigation and inequalities in the Senegal River Delta.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIrrigation is considered to be one of the best solutions to fight drought spells in agriculture but also to lift farmers out of poverty through improved water provision, and thus crop yields. However, irrigated agriculture, as organized in Africa, has often generated new inequalities between farmers because of the larger areas cultivated by a minority of farmers, which allows them to earn higher incomes compared to small farmers. This study aims to provide evidence from the Senegal river delta, one of the largest irrigated rice areas in Senegal, on how inequalities have indeed increased over time.
methodsIt is based on a survey conducted among 326 households (HHs) on total land area cultivated, investment in irrigation and agricultural income. Inequalities were calculated through Lorenz curve and Gini index.
resultsResults show the large disparities in areas cultivated by each HH. A minority cultivates more than 100 ha while the majority cultivates less than 2 ha. As a result, only some 7% of producers generate profits from irrigated agriculture, while most HHs experience net income deficits. In addition, due to difficulties in applying double-cropping of rice, especially among small farmers, inequalities remain what they are, while the hydro-agricultural developments carried out in this area were supposed to allow even three crops per year on the same plot.
conclusionAs there is not enough idle land left, it is difficult to increase the areas planted by HHs. In the absence of new developments, the practice of double-cropping on existing farms, especially among small farmers, would help reduce inequalities and facilitate rice self-sufficiency, which the country has been seeking for decades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.