Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42013118›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Cognitive load and pedagogical tension in multi-platform online learning: Evidence from Chinese higher education.

Xiaoqin Qiu, Nengsheng Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaoqin QiuDepartment of General Education, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8692-0830
Nengsheng QiuSchool of Foreign Languages, Xiamen Institute of Technology, Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5476-4761

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of digital tools has transformed higher education into a complex, multi-platform online learning environment. This study investigates the paradoxical effects of this multi-platform environment on the student experience within Chinese higher education. Through the qualitative and quantitative data from a cross-sectional survey of 8,616 university students, we analyzed platform usage patterns, perceived benefits and challenges. The findings reveal a significant paradox: while students express positive attitudes towards platforms' educational value, acknowledging benefits like enhanced self-directed learning and improved teacher-student interaction, they concurrently report substantial practical burdens. A serial mediation model confirmed that platform multiplicity increases extraneous cognitive load, which in turn elevates tool fatigue, ultimately leading to a more negative perception of the learning experience. This study identifies a core "pedagogical tension" between the intended benefits of educational technology and the lived reality of a fragmented, high-friction user experience that encourages instrumental engagement over deep learning. These findings underscore the urgent need for institutions and instructors to adopt a more strategic, integrated approach to educational technology to reduce fragmentation and prioritize a seamless student learning experience.

Indexed as

CognitionEducation, DistanceLearningStudentsAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDigital MediaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42013118
PMCPMC13098912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.