ArticlePloS one2026
Overseas reception of English translations of Journey to the West: Temporal dynamics, cross-platform sentiment patterns, and topic modeling.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The overseas reception of classical literature through online platforms presents a critical lens for understanding cross-cultural dynamics in the digital age. This study investigates the overseas reception of English translations of Journey to the West by analyzing a corpus of 1,795 reviews from Amazon and Goodreads to examine temporal dynamics, cross-platform sentiment patterns, and topic modeling. The analysis covers four celebrated translators: Arthur Waley, Anthony C. Yu, Julia Lovell, and W.J.F. Jenner. Methodologically, we developed a hybrid sentiment lexicon by integrating a domain sentiment lexicon with AFINN, NRC, and VADER through weighted fusion, addressing the limited adaptability of general sentiment lexicons in translated literature analysis. LDA modeling was further applied to enable data-driven theme extraction. Key findings reveal a consistent year-on-year increase in review counts across all translations. Notably, despite an overall positive sentiment, significant cross-platform divergences emerge, reflecting the distinct evaluative mechanisms of digital platforms. Thematic analysis identifies three central reader concerns: translation quality, plot acceptance, and character portrayal, with plot acceptance exhibiting markedly higher negativity. Furthermore, translator-level analysis reveals performance variations across these themes. This study demonstrates how digital platforms reconfigure the valuation of literary translation, and pioneers a methodological framework for capturing the dynamic interplay between reader perception, media infrastructure, and textual mobility, offering new pathways for digital humanities research in translation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.