ArticlePloS one2026
Trade-offs in cotton pest management: Seed treatments suppress pests but reduce the abundance of natural enemies in the arthropod community.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pesticide seed treatments are widely used to protect crops from early-season pests and diseases; however, their broader ecological effects on arthropod communities and non-target organisms remain insufficiently understood. A two-year field experiment was conducted in a cotton agroecosystem to evaluate the community-level effects of seed-applied clothianidin (CLO) and a fungicide mixture containing azoxystrobin, metalaxyl-m, and fludioxonil (AMF). Changes in arthropod population density and diversity were assessed across taxonomic and community levels. The dominant arthropod families recorded included Nabidae, Miridae, Anthocoridae, Asilidae, Chrysopidae, Cicadellidae, and Coccinellidae. Both seed treatments suppressed key sucking pest groups, particularly Cicadellidae and Miridae; however, a significant reduction in predator abundance was also observed in treated plots. These findings indicate a potential trade-off between effective pest suppression and the conservation of natural enemy populations within the arthropod community. Principal response curve (PRC) analysis further demonstrated treatment-related shifts in arthropod communities over time. The results highlight the importance of considering non-target ecological responses when evaluating the sustainability of prophylactic seed treatments in cotton agroecosystems and emphasize the need for long-term investigations into their impacts on multitrophic interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.