ArticlePloS one2026
Epidemiological analysis and comparison of 259 extensive burn patients from 2010 to 2021: Evidence for autonomous medical team.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to investigate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with extensive burns admitted to a burn center in eastern China from 2010 to 2021 and to evaluate the impact of an autonomous medical team implemented in 2016 on patient management.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients admitted to the Burn and Trauma Center at the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021. Data were compared and statistically analyzed using SPSS (version 26.0) for two periods: 2010-2015 and 2016-2021.
resultsThis study enrolled a total of 259 patients, with 106 cases spanning from 2010 to 2015 and 153 cases from the period of 2016-2021. Among them, there were a total of 198 male patients (76.4%) and 61 female patients (23.6%). The age range of the subjects varied between 1 and 90 years old, with a median age of 44 years (30 ~ 54 years). The distribution of burn total body surface area (%TBSA) ranged from 30% to 99%, with a median TBSA value of 50% (35% ~ 72%). Flame burns constituted the majority cause for extensive burns, accounting for 151 cases (58.8%), followed by scald burns comprising 51 cases (19.8%). Extensive burns predominantly occurred during the summer season. The limbs were identified as the most commonly affected areas, accounting for 146 cases (56.4%). The median length of hospital stay was recorded as 44 days (28-67.75 days), while the overall mortality rate stood at 7.34%. The proportion of middle-aged and elderly individuals increased in recent 6 years compared to earlier period. The incidence of flame and chemical burns decreased, while the severity exhibited an increase. There was a significant rise in the average number of surgical procedures performed during hospitalization. Meanwhile, the mortality rate experienced a decline without any notable variation in total length or cost associated with hospital stay.
conclusionsOur research findings suggest the need for dynamic adjustments in burn prevention measures based on changes in epidemiological characteristics, while also advocating for the establishment of autonomous medical teams with decision-making authority for critical care treatment of extensive burn patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.