ArticlePloS one2026
A multi-dimensional assessment of the 2021 mouse plague in New South Wales, Australia: Economic impacts and policy responses.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the periodic mouse plague outbreaks in Australia which largely occur due to favourable climatic conditions, their economic impacts remain understudied. To bridge this knowledge gap, the present study analysed the economic impacts of the 2021 mouse plague in New South Wales (Australia) among households, farms, and businesses/facilities. We further analysed the influence of selected cost parameters on mouse bait rebate claims by the farmers as well as the relative efficiency of the chemical mouse control options used by farmers to minimize avoidable crop yield losses. Our study found that the total direct cost of the 2021 mouse plague was A$ 100.62 million, with farmers bearing 67.10% of the total cost. It was also revealed that the type of farming influenced the likelihood of a farmer claiming or not claiming mouse bait rebate. The most efficient chemical mouse control option was the combination of anticoagulants used around buildings and zinc phosphide used in pastures and crops as it reduced avoidable crop yield losses more than each rodenticide when used independently. However, more research is required on how other variables may influence the efficiency of mouse control methods to forestall future outbreaks of mouse plagues and their associated economic impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.