ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
The continuous dynamics of planning and acting in a virtually embodied task.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The continuous dynamics of planning and acting in a virtually embodied task.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Human foraging strategies flexibly adapt to resource distribution and time constraints.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Organization of affordance processing in perception-action systems.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Adaptive planning depth in human problem-solving.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Everyday tasks, such as selecting routes when driving or preparing meals, require making sequences of embodied decisions, in which planning and action processes are intertwined. Here, we address how people make sequential embodied decisions, requiring balancing between immediate affordances and long-term utilities of alternative action plans. We designed a virtually embodied task in which participants controlled an avatar tasked with "crossing rivers" by jumping across rocks. The task permitted us to assess how participants balanced between immediate jumping affordances ("safe" vs. "risky" jumps) and the utility (length) of the ensuing paths to the goal. Behavioral and computational analyses revealed that participants planned ahead their path to the goal rather than simply focusing on the immediate jumping affordances. Furthermore, spatial and embodied components of the task influenced participants' decision strategies, as participants' current direction of movement and momentum influenced their choice between safe and risky jumps. Additionally, participants showed (pre)planning before making the first jump, but they continued deliberating during it, with movement speed decreasing at decision points and when approaching them. Computational modeling indicates that farsighted participants who assigned greater weight to the utility of future jumps showed a better performance, highlighting the usefulness of planning in embodied settings. Finally, analyzing participants' performance indicates that during the experiment, they become faster in moving and deciding but they do not change their overall strategy. Our findings underscore the importance of studying decision-making in ecologically valid, embodied settings, providing insights into the interplay between action and cognition in real-world planning-while-acting scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.