Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42012827›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Use of Paracervical Blocks for Patients Who Undergo Intrauterine Device Insertion.

Jacquelyn M Roger, Jean Costello, Halle Young, Thaybeth I Malave-Mendez, Brenda Y Miao, Claire D Brindis, Karen Meckstroth, Ryan D Hernandez, Sara Whetstone, Marissa Raymond-Flesch and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jacquelyn M RogerBiological and Medical Informatics Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco.
Jean CostelloDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Halle YoungMedical Anthropology Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco.
Thaybeth I Malave-MendezPharmaceutical Sciences and Pharmacogenomics Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco.
Brenda Y MiaoBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco.
Claire D BrindisPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco.
Karen MeckstrothDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Ryan D HernandezDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Sara WhetstoneDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Marissa Raymond-FleschPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco.
John A CapraDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
M Maria GlymourDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Dara TorgersonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Paracervical blocks can reduce pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertions, but the extent and context in which they are used in practice are unclear. Objective: To evaluate paracervical block use during IUD insertions in an academic health system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional time-series study was performed at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), academic health care system using electronic health record data. Participants included individuals who underwent IUD insertions between July 2, 2012, and August 16, 2024. Data were analyzed from October 2023 to April 2025. Exposure: Clinic-, clinician-, and patient-level variables. Main Outcomes and Measures: Paracervical block receipt was determined from clinical notes. Associations of paracervical block receipt with variables at the clinic, clinician, and patient levels were estimated with multilevel models. The role of clinic specialty (pediatrics or adolescent medicine vs all other specialties) in accounting for the association of age less than 18 years with paracervical block receipt was evaluated using causal mediation analysis. Results: Among 13 702 IUD insertions (median patient age, 33.16 [IQR, 27.62-37.73] years), 11 713 (85.5%) took place within obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN) specialty clinics and almost half (6049 [44.1%]) occurred between a patient-clinician dyad who had never seen each other before. Overall, 5311 insertions (38.8%) included a paracervical block. Paracervical blocks were less frequently used in non-OB-GYN specialties (odds ratio [OR], 0.01; 95% CI, 0.001-0.07) and appointments scheduled for less than 30 minutes (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.90) and more frequently used when the patient-clinician dyad had a prior visit together (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09-1.48). A lower proportion of patients aged less than 18 years (84 of 347 [24.2%]) compared with adults (5227 of 135 55 [38.6%]) received a paracervical block, an association mediated by the former population more often receiving care in pediatrics and adolescent medicine clinics (total effect risk difference [RD], -0.11 [95% CI, -0.19 to -0.03]; indirect effect RD, -0.22 [95% CI, -0.26 to -0.18]). Latine patients (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.94 [reference group, non-Hispanic White patients]) and patients with a preferred language besides English (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.96) had lower odds of receiving a paracervical block during IUD insertion. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional time series study of IUD insertion procedures in a large academic health system, Latine ethnicity, non-English language preference, no prior patient-clinician visit together, and shorter appointment length were associated with lower odds of receiving paracervical blocks. Potential conduits for increasing paracervical block access include training opportunities, equitable clinic policies, and sufficient appointment duration.

Indexed as

Intrauterine DevicesNerve BlockAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42012827
PMCPMC13100842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.