ArticleJAMA network open2026
Use of Paracervical Blocks for Patients Who Undergo Intrauterine Device Insertion.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Paracervical blocks can reduce pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertions, but the extent and context in which they are used in practice are unclear. Objective: To evaluate paracervical block use during IUD insertions in an academic health system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional time-series study was performed at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), academic health care system using electronic health record data. Participants included individuals who underwent IUD insertions between July 2, 2012, and August 16, 2024. Data were analyzed from October 2023 to April 2025. Exposure: Clinic-, clinician-, and patient-level variables. Main Outcomes and Measures: Paracervical block receipt was determined from clinical notes. Associations of paracervical block receipt with variables at the clinic, clinician, and patient levels were estimated with multilevel models. The role of clinic specialty (pediatrics or adolescent medicine vs all other specialties) in accounting for the association of age less than 18 years with paracervical block receipt was evaluated using causal mediation analysis. Results: Among 13 702 IUD insertions (median patient age, 33.16 [IQR, 27.62-37.73] years), 11 713 (85.5%) took place within obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN) specialty clinics and almost half (6049 [44.1%]) occurred between a patient-clinician dyad who had never seen each other before. Overall, 5311 insertions (38.8%) included a paracervical block. Paracervical blocks were less frequently used in non-OB-GYN specialties (odds ratio [OR], 0.01; 95% CI, 0.001-0.07) and appointments scheduled for less than 30 minutes (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.90) and more frequently used when the patient-clinician dyad had a prior visit together (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09-1.48). A lower proportion of patients aged less than 18 years (84 of 347 [24.2%]) compared with adults (5227 of 135 55 [38.6%]) received a paracervical block, an association mediated by the former population more often receiving care in pediatrics and adolescent medicine clinics (total effect risk difference [RD], -0.11 [95% CI, -0.19 to -0.03]; indirect effect RD, -0.22 [95% CI, -0.26 to -0.18]). Latine patients (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.94 [reference group, non-Hispanic White patients]) and patients with a preferred language besides English (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.96) had lower odds of receiving a paracervical block during IUD insertion. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional time series study of IUD insertion procedures in a large academic health system, Latine ethnicity, non-English language preference, no prior patient-clinician visit together, and shorter appointment length were associated with lower odds of receiving paracervical blocks. Potential conduits for increasing paracervical block access include training opportunities, equitable clinic policies, and sufficient appointment duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.