Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42012826›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2026

Doula Care and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Peyton Groves, Hannah Williams, Cynthia L Salter, Abigail Smith Kosbie, Adena Bowden, Ruben G Martinez, Jessica Davis, Dara D Méndez, Maya I Ragavan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peyton GrovesDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Hannah WilliamsDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Cynthia L SalterDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abigail Smith KosbieHealthy Start Incorporated, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Adena BowdenHealthy Start Incorporated, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ruben G MartinezDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Jessica DavisHealthy Start Incorporated, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Dara D MéndezDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Maya I RagavanDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Maternal-infant health inequities remain a critical public health issue in the US, where adverse maternal and infant health outcomes disproportionately affect American Indian or Alaska Native and Black populations. Doula care-where trained doula professionals provide physical, emotional, and informational support across the perinatal continuum-is a community-based strategy to improve outcomes. Objective: To systematically evaluate clinical and pilot trial evidence on the association of doula care with maternal and infant health outcomes; identify gaps in study design, equity, and implementation; and propose future directions for clinical practice, health systems research, and policy. Evidence Review: This systematic review included articles published between January 1, 2000, and January 31, 2026. Searches in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL, plus reference and expert review, identified eligible clinical or pilot trials assessing maternal and infant outcomes. Protocols, secondary analyses, abstracts, and non-English articles were excluded. Data on study design, intervention characteristics, outcomes, and risk of bias were qualitatively synthesized. Findings: Twenty-two articles describing 21 unique interventions met inclusion criteria. Most were randomized clinical trials (17 of 21 [81.0%]), with others using quasiexperimental or preference-based designs. Interventions had heterogeneity in scope, intensity, and doula training. Findings were most consistent for improved maternal anxiety, postpartum follow-up, and breastfeeding initiation, while evidence for outcomes such as cesarean delivery and pain management was more variable. Few studies addressed postpartum, abortion, or broader reproductive health contexts (eg, fertility or bereavement doulas). Methodologic gaps included limited reporting of fidelity and implementation, underrepresentation of marginalized populations, and failure to account for crossover in control groups. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this systematic review of clinical trials suggest that doula care may improve perinatal anxiety, health care utilization, and breastfeeding initiation, although the evidence for other outcomes was inconsistent. Future studies should use rigorous designs, ensure equitable representation, examine full-spectrum care, and assess implementation to support sustainable integration into maternal health systems.

Indexed as

DoulasFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42012826
PMCPMC13100869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.