Trial reportPsycho-oncology2026
Web-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation for Patients With Aggressive Lymphoma With Perceived Cognitive Impairment: A Randomised Pilot Study.
Trial report in Psycho-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploration of experience and sustained engagement with a web-based cognitive rehabilitation intervention amongst patients with aggressive lymphoma: a qualitative sub-study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Trial
- Methodology of analysis of cognitive impairment in longitudinal randomized clinical trials in oncology: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a frequent side effect of cancer and its treatment that can persist well after treatment completion, with major impacts on quality of life, daily living activities, and return to work. This randomised pilot study assesses the feasibility and acceptability of methods and procedures intended for use in a definitive trial of a web-based cognitive rehabilitation program-'Responding to Cognitive Concerns" (eReCog)-in people with low perceived cognitive function after chemotherapy for aggressive lymphoma within the past 5 years and were in remission. Potential efficacy was also explored.
methodsParticipants were randomised one-to-one to receive usual care or eReCog plus usual care. The 4-week eReCog program consists of four online modules based on the principles of cognitive behavioral therapy. Operational, neuropsychological test and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data were collected before randomisation and approximately 8 weeks later to assess trial outcomes. Primary feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention rates (a priori progression criteria: ≥ 3 patients/month and ≥ 80% of participants complete the trial, respectively). Feasibility data were summarised using a rate or proportion, as appropriate, with 95% confidence intervals. Neuropsychological test and PROMs data were analyzed using analysis of covariance.
results38 of 53 eligible participants consented to participate over 10 months (3.8 patients/month, 95% CI [2.7, 5.2]), 19 were randomised to each arm, and 36 of 38 (95%, 95% CI [83, 99]) completed the trial, indicating acceptable feasibility. Acceptable feasibility was also found for all four secondary outcomes: adherence to, usability of, and intrinsic motivation to engage with eReCog; and compliance with assessments. A large-sized difference favoring the intervention arm was observed on the SCWT Word score measuring processing speed. Medium-sized differences were observed on other neuropsychological test and PROM scales, but confidence intervals were wide and included zero.
conclusionsRecruitment and retention rates, compliance with assessments and favorable changes on potential outcome measures suggest a large-scale, appropriately powered trial is warranted, as do findings that eReCog is acceptable to the study population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12623000705684.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.