ArticleHealth economics review2026
The economic burden of COVID-19 undervaccination: costs of hospitalisation, ICU admission, and death in Scotland.
Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed substantial financial and operational pressures on healthcare systems globally. While vaccines were known to reduce severe outcomes, their broader economic impacts, especially in publicly funded health systems, requires clearer quantification. This study evaluates the direct healthcare costs associated with COVID-19 outcomes in relation to vaccination status, using linked individual-level data from Scotland’s EAVE II cohort (June to September 2022). We defined undervaccination as the shortfall between recommended and received COVID-19 vaccine doses, stratified by age group. Retrospective cohort analysis employing Cox proportional hazards and linear regression models was used to assess the associations between undervaccination and the risk, frequency, and duration of hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death. We also conducted a counterfactual analysis to estimate averted costs and quality-adjusted life years gained (QALYs) under a full vaccination scenario.Findings demonstrate a strong dose–response relationship between undervaccination and severe COVID-19 outcomes. Among individuals aged 75+, those with higher undervaccination levels showed significantly increased hazard ratios for hospitalisation (up to 3.92 for sub-optimal level 2), ICU admission (up to 12.53 for sub-optimal level 2), and mortality (up to 6.63 for sub-optimal level 3). These elevated risks translated into substantial direct healthcare costs. Hospitalisation costs reached £4.7 million for the 75+ group and £2.6 million for the 16–74 group, while ICU costs totalled £70,489 and £246,486, respectively. Under a counterfactual full vaccination scenario, potentially avertable hospital costs were estimated at £1.4 million for the 75+ group and £0.5 million for the 16–74 group. Vaccination rates were lower among younger individuals, ethnic minorities, and residents in more deprived areas, highlighting persistent health inequalities. Of the total cohort of 4,992,498 individuals, 65.8% were fully vaccinated on 1 June 2022, while 34.2% were undervaccinated. These inequalities were not only clinically consequential but also economically costly: undervaccinated individuals generated more than five-fold the COVID-19 healthcare spend of their fully vaccinated peers. Universal full vaccination could have averted approximately £1.4 million (75+) and £0.5 million (16–74) in hospital costs, and a further £38,000 in ICU costs, during summer 2022.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.