ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2026
A Paradigm Shift in Addressing Threats to Science.
Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current threats to science endangering global health are widely discernible, and the related discussion is ongoing. However, other speculations are progressively taking up the space of clinical debate. These narratives, belonging to ideological stances, take up spaces in daily life and hail different explanations and causes. The modalities through which such different instances and explanations are conveyed result in establishing a different reality of truth, regardless of the scientific debate. As a matter of fact, such modalities lead to an open-conflict structure that frames a discursive layout starting from an exclusive position when interacting. In response to this, we should act in terms of scientific sense, without considering the increasing influence of these narratives as a fact to struggle against, but rather evaluating the possibilities of generating and modifying the configurations of such discursive reality toward a common and shared goal, with pragmatic repercussions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42012766What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.