Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42012758›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026

3D visualization of graphene and carbon nanotubes using Python: a study.

Ashutosh Sharma, Sanjeev Kumar, Kuldeep Kumar, P Arun, Manveer Singh, Deepti Jain

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashutosh SharmaDepartment of Physics, R. K. (PG) College Shamli, M. S. University, Saharanpur, UP, 247776, India.
Sanjeev KumarDepartment of Physics, R. K. (PG) College Shamli, M. S. University, Saharanpur, UP, 247776, India.
Kuldeep KumarDepartment of Physics, S. G. T. B. Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
P ArunDepartment of Physics, S. G. T. B. Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Manveer SinghDepartment of Physics, Ramjas College, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Deepti JainDepartment of Physics, S. K. K. Jain (PG) College Khatauli, M. S. University, Saharanpur, UP, 251201, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe accurate visualization and modeling of nanostructures, such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene play a crucial role in advancing nanoscale research and applications. The versatile properties of graphene and CNTs make them fashionable among the scientific community. Modeling and simulation play an important role in understanding and predicting the behavior of these nanomaterials. Traditional modeling approaches often rely on specialized software and complex computational methods. However, the advent of versatile programming languages like Python has opened new avenues for simulating and visualizing nanostructures. Python's extensive libraries and user-friendly syntax make it an attractive tool for researchers aiming to model CNTs and graphene structures. The study demonstrated 3D visualization of graphene and two configurations of CNTs, namely single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) marvelously using Python-based libraries. The Python codes of 3D nanostructure models advance the nanoscale research.

methodThe present study investigates the potential and limitations of Python-based libraries with a primary focus on Mayavi and PyVista for rendering and analyzing these nanostructures, while Mayavi offers a high-level 3D visualization interface built on visualization toolkit (VTK). The attempts to generate structurally accurate CNTs and graphene lattices revealed several critical challenges, including improper bonding representation, lattice distortions, and scaling inconsistencies. Moreover, the study presents the implementation strategies, code structure, and visual output limitations encountered during the modeling process. To provide a comparative landscape, additional tools such as Matplotlib (for 2D visualization), VPython (for quick atomic modeling), and atomic simulation environment (ASE) are briefly evaluated. The study also describes the role of NumPy, SciPy, and Pymatgen in computational geometry, structural logic, and periodic boundary condition (PBC) modeling.

Indexed as

3D simulationCNTsGrapheneMayaviMWCNTsNanostructure modelingPython visualizationPyVistaSWCNTs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.